Constitutional Court Suspends Prime Minister Over Ethics Allegation
Thailand’s Constitutional Court has suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra amid an investigation into an alleged breach of ethics linked to a leaked phone call with a senior Cambodian official. The judges voted unanimously to admit the complaint and, by a 7-2 majority, temporarily removed her from office while she prepares her legal defense. She has 15 days to submit evidence.
Political Fallout from a Leaked Diplomatic Call
The call, which emerged during heightened tensions over a border clash that left a Cambodian soldier dead, has provoked domestic uproar. In the recording, Paetongtarn referred to a prominent Thai general as an obstacle and sought the support of Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen, igniting protests and a crisis within her ruling coalition.
Interim Leadership and Cabinet Reshuffle
Following the court’s decision, Deputy Prime Minister Suriya Juangroongruangkit is expected to take over in an acting capacity. Meanwhile, King Vajiralongkorn approved a cabinet reshuffle, replacing key ministers from the coalition party that withdrew in protest. Paetongtarn, who had also assumed the role of culture minister, may not be able to retain that position during the suspension.
Broader Political and Legal Implications
Paetongtarn’s suspension echoes past events in Thai politics, where the courts have played a central role in removing prime ministers from the Shinawatra family. She also faces an ongoing investigation by the National Anti-Corruption Commission, which could determine her future in politics.
Protests and Public Sentiment
Thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of Bangkok over the weekend, demanding her resignation. Nationalist groups accused her of compromising national sovereignty and weakening Thailand’s negotiating position with its neighbor.
Looking Ahead
Thailand now faces a period of political uncertainty. As the ethics probe continues and pressure mounts both within Parliament and among the public, questions remain about the stability of the government and the country’s democratic institutions.
